While the recent holding in Univ. of California v. Broad Institute, Inc., will certainly have long-reaching and important implications in the fight for control over CRISPR-based technology, the Federal Circuit’s opinion also provides additional confirmation that an obviousness determination must demonstrate a “reasonable expectation of success” when combining references from the prior art.
Author: Jeffrey K. Mills, Ph.D.
A catalog distributed at a members-only trade show is a printed publication under 35 USC § 102(b). The Federal Circuit vacated and remanded a Board decision finding that an IPR challenger's catalog distributed at a trade show was not sufficiently available to the general public to qualify as a printed publication. The Federal Circuit found that the Board failed to cite any cases where the Federal Circuit has "strictly held that the expertise of the target audience is dispositive of the inquiry of accessibility."Read More
One June 7, 2018, the USPTO issued a Memorandum to the Examining Corps emphasizing that method of treatment claims can satisfy 35 U.S.C. §101 under the first step of the two-part Alice/Mayo analysis without requiring a showing of nonroutine or unconventional steps.
Author: Melissa J. Pytel
For many patent practitioners, drafting a patent application based on an invention disclosure is one of the skills learned during the formative years of practice. It often involves repeated discussions with inventors regarding the scope, focus and overall concept of the invention to be described. What may not be a focus, however, is a full discussion of the contributions of those involved in the disclosure to determine whether they should be listed as inventors of the patent application. A recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) highlights the importance of these discussions, even though they may be difficult or unpleasant to conduct.Read More